Rocketlane CEO

 Founder Spotlight

Billie Whitehouse of Wearable X

Want to know what it is really like to start a company? In our Founder Spotlight series we have candid conversations with real founders about the good, bad and ugly of getting your hands dirty and building a business.

Meet Billie Whitehouse of Wearable X. Wearable X is a fashion tech company that brings together design and technology to create a better quality of life. We had the opportunity to speak with their founder, Billie Whitehouse, to learn more about her journey, the viral magic of vibrating knickers, her fear of sharing and her new love of kite surfing.

How Free Bets Became a Staple of Australian Sports Wagering Culture

The relationship between Australian sports fans and wagering has always been deeply embedded in the national sporting culture. From the Melbourne Cup to the AFL Grand Final, betting has long been considered a natural accompaniment to watching sport. But over the past two decades, one particular promotional mechanism has fundamentally reshaped how Australians engage with wagering operators: the free bet. What began as a relatively simple customer acquisition tool has evolved into a sophisticated, regulated, and deeply ingrained feature of the Australian sports wagering landscape. Understanding how free bets arrived, how they grew, and how they are now governed reveals a great deal about the broader commercialisation of sport in Australia and the ongoing tension between consumer engagement and responsible gambling obligations.

The Origins of Promotional Betting Offers in Australia

To understand the prominence of free bets in Australian wagering culture today, it is necessary to go back to the regulatory environment that existed before the digital era. For most of the twentieth century, Australian wagering was dominated by totalisator systems operated by state-based racing bodies, most notably the TAB (Totalisator Agency Board), which was established in Victoria in 1961 and subsequently rolled out across other states and territories. These government-controlled entities had little incentive to offer promotional bonuses — they operated as near-monopolies, and punters had limited alternatives. Bookmakers existed, particularly on-course, but their reach was constrained by geography and regulation.

The shift began in earnest with the Interactive Gambling Act of 2001, which attempted to regulate online gambling but inadvertently created a framework within which licensed sports wagering operators could legally accept bets online from Australian residents. Crucially, the legislation distinguished between interactive gambling services (like online casino games) and sports betting, with the latter occupying a more permissive regulatory space. This opened the door for a wave of corporate bookmakers — both domestic and international — to establish operations in Australia, typically licensing through the Northern Territory, which offered a comparatively favourable regulatory environment.

With multiple operators now competing for the same pool of punters, the free bet emerged as a logical and powerful differentiator. Early promotional offers in the mid-2000s were relatively crude by today’s standards — a matched deposit bonus here, a refund on a losing first bet there. But even these basic offers proved effective at driving account sign-ups and initial deposits. Operators quickly recognised that the cost of a free bet was easily justified by the lifetime value of an active wagering customer. The psychology was straightforward: giving a new customer a no-risk opportunity to place a wager dramatically lowered the barrier to entry and created a sense of loyalty before any real money had been wagered.

By the late 2000s, the Australian market had become one of the most competitive sports wagering environments in the world. Operators including Sportsbet, Bet365, William Hill Australia, and Ladbrokes were spending aggressively on customer acquisition, and free bet promotions were central to those strategies. Television advertising featuring free bet offers became ubiquitous during live sports broadcasts, a phenomenon that would eventually attract significant regulatory scrutiny.

How Free Bets Became Structurally Embedded in the Market

The transition from free bets being a novelty to being an expectation happened gradually but decisively across the 2010s. Several structural factors contributed to this normalisation. First, the rise of mobile wagering fundamentally changed how and when Australians placed bets. With smartphones enabling in-play and pre-match wagering from anywhere, operators needed ongoing mechanisms to keep customers engaged across an increasingly fragmented media landscape. Free bets — particularly those triggered by specific in-game events, such as a team scoring first or a player reaching a statistical milestone — became tools for sustaining engagement throughout a broadcast, not merely at the point of account creation.

Second, the expansion of sports wagering beyond horse racing into Australian rules football, rugby league, cricket, and eventually international sports like English Premier League football and American basketball created new promotional opportunities. Operators began designing free bet offers specifically around major sporting events — Grand Finals, State of Origin series, the Ashes — creating a seasonal rhythm to promotional activity that mirrored the sporting calendar itself. This alignment between free bet promotions and the emotional peaks of Australian sporting culture made the offers feel less like advertising and more like participation.

Third, loyalty programs evolved to incorporate free bets as ongoing rewards rather than purely sign-up incentives. Operators developed tiered reward structures where regular bettors would receive free bets based on their wagering activity, effectively making promotional offers a permanent feature of the customer relationship rather than a one-time acquisition tool. This shift had significant implications for problem gambling, as it meant that free bets were now being directed at existing customers with established wagering habits rather than solely at new entrants to the market.

The mechanics of free bets also grew considerably more sophisticated during this period. Early offers were straightforward — place a bet with your own money, receive a matching free bet credit. By the mid-2010s, operators were offering multi-leg free bet bonuses, odds-boost promotions, cash-back offers on specific outcomes, and “bet and get” structures where a qualifying bet of a specified amount would unlock a free bet of a different value. Each of these variations was carefully designed to maximise engagement while managing the operator’s risk exposure. Punters who wanted to extract maximum value from these offers needed to understand concepts like turnover requirements, minimum odds thresholds, and the difference between a free bet credit and a cash bonus — a level of financial literacy that not all customers possessed.

For those researching the evolution of wagering promotions and seeking to understand the current landscape of available offers in Australia, resources that aggregate and explain current promotional structures can be useful. Consumers looking to compare current sign-up offers across licensed operators can click here to access a comparison of current promotions, which outlines the terms and conditions attached to various free bet structures currently available in the Australian market. Understanding these terms — particularly turnover requirements and expiry conditions — is essential before committing to any promotional offer.

Regulatory Responses and the Changing Shape of Free Bet Promotions

The ubiquity of free bet advertising did not go unnoticed by regulators and public health advocates. By the early 2010s, community concern about the volume and targeting of gambling promotions during live sports broadcasts had reached a point where legislative action became politically viable. The catalyst was a sustained campaign by advocacy groups, medical professionals, and some media commentators who argued that the normalisation of wagering — and particularly free bet advertising — was exposing children to gambling content during family viewing times and contributing to problem gambling rates.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) and the federal government responded with a series of measures that progressively tightened the rules around gambling advertising. The Broadcasting Services Act was amended to restrict gambling advertisements during live sports broadcasts before 8:30 PM, with some exceptions for racing content. Operators were also required to include responsible gambling messaging in their promotional communications, and the use of certain types of inducements — particularly those that could be seen as targeting vulnerable consumers — came under greater scrutiny.

The 2017 review of the Interactive Gambling Act introduced further changes, including a prohibition on credit betting and tighter rules around the marketing of wagering services. The review also flagged concerns about the use of free bets as inducements, though it stopped short of banning them outright. Instead, the regulatory focus shifted toward transparency — requiring operators to clearly disclose the terms and conditions of promotional offers, including wagering requirements, minimum odds, and expiry periods.

State and territory regulators also played a role. The Northern Territory Racing Commission, which licenses the majority of Australia’s corporate bookmakers, introduced a National Consumer Protection Framework in 2019 that included requirements around the responsible use of promotional offers. Under this framework, operators were required to implement opt-out mechanisms for promotions, meaning that customers could elect to receive no promotional communications, including free bet offers. This was a meaningful change — it acknowledged that for some customers, the receipt of free bet promotions could act as a trigger for harmful gambling behaviour.

The industry’s response to these regulatory pressures was, predictably, mixed. Some operators made genuine efforts to implement responsible gambling measures around their promotional activities, including restricting free bet offers to customers who had not self-excluded or set deposit limits. Others were slower to adapt, and enforcement actions by state and territory regulators became more frequent through the late 2010s and into the 2020s. The Australian Communications and Media Authority also took action against operators and broadcasters for breaches of the gambling advertising restrictions, with penalties including formal warnings and, in some cases, financial sanctions.

Despite this regulatory activity, free bets remained a legal and widely used promotional tool. The regulatory framework that emerged was not one that sought to eliminate free bet promotions but rather to manage them — ensuring they were offered transparently, targeted appropriately, and accompanied by responsible gambling information. This approach reflected a broader Australian policy tendency toward harm minimisation rather than prohibition, a stance that has shaped gambling regulation across multiple domains for decades.

The Cultural Significance of Free Bets in Contemporary Australian Wagering

Beyond the regulatory and commercial dimensions, the free bet has acquired genuine cultural significance in Australian sports wagering. For many recreational bettors, the free bet has become a standard part of how they engage with major sporting events — an expected accompaniment to the experience of watching sport, much like a membership card or a tipping competition. The language of free bets has entered everyday sporting conversation: “I’ve got a free bet on the footy this weekend” is a phrase that requires no explanation in most Australian social contexts involving sport.

This cultural embedding has been reinforced by the media ecosystem that surrounds Australian sport. Sports commentary programs, podcasts, and social media accounts operated by or affiliated with wagering operators regularly discuss free bet offers as part of their content. Former athletes who work as media commentators frequently appear in wagering operator advertising, and the line between sports analysis and wagering promotion has become genuinely blurred in parts of the Australian media landscape. This integration means that free bets are not experienced by many consumers as advertising in the traditional sense but as part of the fabric of sports media consumption.

The demographic reach of free bet promotions has also broadened considerably. While wagering has historically skewed toward older male demographics in Australia, the digital and mobile wagering environment has attracted younger bettors, including women, who engage with wagering in ways that differ from traditional patterns. Free bet promotions, particularly those tied to social media activity or referral programs, have been effective at reaching these new demographics. Research published by the Australian Institute of Family Studies and various state health departments has documented rising rates of sports wagering among young adults aged 18 to 34, a trend that regulators and public health researchers have linked, at least in part, to the effectiveness of promotional offers in lowering the perceived risk of wagering.

The question of what free bets actually cost — both operators and consumers — is one that deserves more public attention than it typically receives. From an operator perspective, free bets represent a calculated investment: the cost of the promotion is offset by the expected lifetime revenue from customers who convert from promotional users to regular bettors. Industry data suggests that conversion rates from free bet promotions vary considerably depending on the structure of the offer and the quality of the customer experience, but operators with sophisticated data analytics capabilities are able to target promotions with considerable precision, directing higher-value offers toward customers most likely to generate long-term revenue.

For consumers, the value of a free bet is frequently overstated in promotional communications. A free bet credit of twenty dollars is not the same as twenty dollars in cash — it can only be used to place a wager, and in most cases, only the winnings (not the stake) are returned if the bet is successful. This distinction means that the effective value of a free bet to a consumer is typically a fraction of its nominal value, a fact that is disclosed in terms and conditions but is rarely emphasised in promotional materials. Consumer advocacy organisations, including the Consumer Policy Research Centre, have called for clearer disclosure standards around the value of wagering promotions, arguing that current practices can mislead consumers about the true benefit of accepting a free bet offer.

The trajectory of free bets in Australia reflects broader tensions in the regulation of a legal but potentially harmful consumer product. The Australian wagering market is now one of the most commercially sophisticated in the world, and free bet promotions are a central pillar of that commercial ecosystem. The challenge for regulators, operators, and public health advocates is to find a sustainable equilibrium — one that allows competitive commercial activity while genuinely protecting consumers who are at risk of harm. That equilibrium has not yet been fully achieved, and the ongoing debate about gambling advertising reform, which intensified again in the early 2020s following a series of parliamentary inquiries, suggests that the regulatory framework governing free bets will continue to evolve in the years ahead.

The story of free bets in Australian sports wagering is ultimately a story about the intersection of commerce, culture, and regulation. What began as a simple marketing tactic has become a defining feature of how millions of Australians engage with sport — shaping not just their wagering behaviour but their broader relationship with sporting events, media, and entertainment. As the regulatory environment continues to develop and as public awareness of gambling-related harm grows, the future shape of free bet promotions remains genuinely uncertain. What is clear is that any meaningful reform of Australian gambling culture will need to grapple seriously with the role that promotional offers have played in normalising wagering and consider carefully how those offers should be structured, disclosed, and targeted in a market that serves both enthusiastic recreational bettors and vulnerable individuals who deserve better protection.

Learn more about Wearable X and receive 20% off their products with code BUZZYROCKET. 

What’s your story? How did you get here? 

About 10 years ago I launched a product with a small group of people. It was vibrating underpants for couples in long distance relationships. With my Australian accent I call them vibrating knickers. It was one of those products that truly went viral. We had 55,000 requests for the product in the first two weeks. We also received 8 million hits on YouTube. Things were truly nuts. What this product taught me is there is something missing from a lot of experiences, so we deep dived into the haptics of vibrational feedback. (Note: Haptics is defined as a technology that transmits tactile information using sensations such as vibration, touch, and force feedback.)

Don’t get me wrong, we made every mistake under the sun before we could get to a place where we could commercialize this. We also decided to look at the full experience vs just the data. For the fitness wellness experience we wanted to help people understand if they were doing something right or wrong – that is why haptics play such an important role. 

What were some of the pivots you thought you may need to make?

Yes, pivots can be crucial. I think this is true for multiple products we have created. We started by looking at basic materials and using them as our foundation to build and leverage. However sometimes you have pressure from clients, or budget or timeline. That is when you pivot based on those inputs because it has to happen. 

For instance, when we were building our second product which was a fan jersey that connects to live sports data so you can feel what your favorite team is experiencing on the field. This can be everything from their heartbeat to the adrenaline or the chills down their spine. We did that with a large sports television network and our development timeline was so crunched due to the timing of the opportunity. We had to move ridiculously fast and that meant we couldn’t fully integrate the electronics. Since the units were separate they were bulkier since you had to take it out to recharge it. There was a bunch of learning in doing that. However you are always going to have inputs like that, whether from the client, software development team, hardware manufacturing team, timeline or budget. The hardest part is being the person who has to make the decision because someone is going to hate you. 

What problem are you trying to solve?

The problem has really remained the same. Since then we changed some branding. For example, our original name was Wearable Experiments because we were truly experimenting. When we decided to go direct to the consumer we became Wearable X. There are three problems we are trying to solve:

  1. Bring people back to themselves and their body
  2. Connect people back to their loved ones and each other
  3. Give people the ability to connect to the spaces and environment they are in

Ultimately we want to help people live well and that is a big overarching problem. We want people to connect to themselves, their loved ones and their environment and not be distracted by their phones everywhere they go. 

                      

Are you intentionally focusing your efforts on one industry? 

Yes, we have been really focused on that. Our product, NADI X, is a yoga line that is fully integrated. The sensors measure everything including your posture and they are paired with ten haptic feedback motors. They provide feedback to your body similar to a yoga instructor. The feedback comes in the form of vibrations. People really don’t really have a good idea where their body is during some of the poses so they receive real time feedback and know if they have achieved the pose or need to try it again. We really started focusing on the home yoga experience that peaked during the pandemic. Home fitness did in general. Unlike a Peloton or the Mirror that lives in one room of your house, you are able to take our products with you on the go to genuinely assist you.

How did you find your target market?

Great question. We originally thought it was going to be the early adopter tech consumer. We went after that audience with our marketing and press and learned the audience that converts the highest were Town and Country readers, a completely different audience. Their readers are middle aged women who look after their body.

Our products gave them freedom from the studio. They didn’t have to worry about the instructor, the music, the timing of the classes and instead were able to practice on their own schedule. Ultimately we found this community of people who didn’t feel confident that they were practicing at home in a way that was beneficial to their body. I think that is the most important piece of the puzzle as we want to give that confidence back to women so they can practice on their own terms. 

How did you get funding? Bootstrap? Self-fund?

We bootstrapped at first because we had income from projects with Fox, Oakley, Bud Light, and American Express, so we were fine as long as everyone paid their bills on time. We were looking for the right manufacturer though and ended up raising $3 million with a strategic partner based out of Sri Lanka. It has been a great partnership as they also do our manufacturing and they actually care. That makes such a difference. They provide a great work environment for their employees. I think anytime anyone hears the word factory, people get nervous. I’ve spent a considerable amount of time in these factories now and felt really confident that it was something that was a great experience for everyone. 

What keeps you up at night?

First and foremost, you have to look after your body and mental experience. I also think it is important to build something great and have a long standing impact for people that is truly beneficial for them. It isn’t the traditional thing that keeps people up at night. .

Do you have any pets?

I’ve been in New York for 10 years while my family and my dog are in Australia. I miss my dog very much. I’d like to get a dog in New York one day.

What are some of your passions outside of work? 

I do yoga. I confess, during the pandemic, my yoga practice wasn’t as diligent as it should have been. Since then, I had a pretty major surgery and so I’m slowly building back into it. That is why health is still number one for me. Prior to the surgery I was also running a lot. I do really enjoy running and then a 20 minute yoga session and then meditation. I’ve also just started to learn how to kite surf which is one of the most exhilarating things I’ve done. 

Are you a risk taker naturally or did you have to learn to embrace risk taking?

I had to learn to embrace risk. I think I came from a fear based family. I had to learn how to put that foot in the water and jump. My parents were entrepreneurs so there was an example that was set when I was growing up. It is important to understand the risk. It is trial and error. One of my mentors encouraged me to put myself out there publicly, which I didn’t really want to do. He said, if you are afraid of what people like what is the point of doing all these things if you aren’t going to share them with anyone. 

Sometimes the process is for yourself. That advice really encouraged me to take the first step because sharing was a big fear of mine. 

What is something that fits into the “If I knew then what I know now” category?

I wish I knew that it is ok to be wrong. I think that is super important. You’re not always going to have all the answers, sometimes you will be wrong and that is ok. I also think it is important to stand up for what you believe in because at times I felt like I let other opinions affect me too much. And as a young entrepreneur, there were several times where I either let my co-founder or even employees bully me which was just dumb. 

What is one misconception of being a founder? 

One of my misconceptions was that everything would be fast. It wasn’t. Patience really is a virtue. I think the misconception is that you do one thing and think it will be the best thing and will explode and you’ll never have to do anything ever again. 

The other common misconception, especially for female founders, is your perception of the experience. It doesn’t have to be hard. With the right support network, the right network and the people – it can be a good experience. People are key. Everyone’s first hire should be someone who is amazing at hiring. Big mistakes in hiring can lead to big problems. 

The Founder Spotlight Series focuses on the entrepreneurial journey. At Buzzy Rocket we are passionate about helping entrepreneurs share their vision. Interested in participating in the Founder Spotlight Series? Contact the Buzzy Rocket team.

Like to be in the know?

Sign up below and receive our weekly Lowdown filled with startup news, startup marketing tips and more.